Hospitality has spent years assuming that bigger portions represent better value.
But what happens when a growing number of customers no longer want them?
Medicines such as Ozempic, Wegovy and Mounjaro are usually discussed in relation to health, weight loss and changing consumer behaviour. However, their growing use could also have significant consequences for hospitality operations.
This is not about creating an “Ozempic menu,” making assumptions about customers or offering medical advice.
It is about recognising that eating and drinking habits are changing and asking whether hospitality businesses are prepared to respond.
This is not a niche customer group
According to NIQ, 5% of British adults are currently using weight-loss medicines. A further 9% have used them during the past year, while another 5% used them previously.
That means nearly one in five British adults has engaged with GLP-1 medication at some point.
These customers have not stopped going out. In fact, 57% of GLP-1 users reportedly eat out at least once a week, which is 20 percentage points higher than the general population.
They still want hospitality.
They may simply want to experience it differently.
The traditional meal is changing
NIQ’s research suggests that among GLP-1 users:
- 28% are skipping starters or desserts
- 27% are choosing starters or small plates instead of a main course
- 29% are drinking less alcohol or drinking more slowly
- 29% are choosing more nutritious dishes
- 28% are selecting lower-calorie options
- 34% have reduced their visits to fast-food restaurants
- 31% have reduced their visits to food-led pubs
These are not just marketing statistics.
They affect menu design, purchasing, preparation, stock levels, recipe costing, labour, sales mix and waste.
If customers begin ordering fewer traditional three-course meals, smaller quantities of alcohol and more flexible combinations of dishes, historical sales patterns may become less reliable.
The question is not simply what should appear on the menu.
The bigger question is whether the operation behind the menu can adapt.
Smaller portions do not automatically mean smaller profits
Some operators may see smaller appetites as a threat to average spend.
They do not have to be.
A smaller, carefully designed dish can offer good value to the customer while maintaining a healthy margin.
The difficulty comes when a business simply reduces the portion without reviewing the recipe, selling price, preparation process and the customer’s perception of value.
That is where proper menu engineering matters.
If a venue wants to introduce smaller portions, it needs to understand:
- The actual cost of the revised recipe
- Whether preparation time has changed
- How the dish should be priced
- Whether it creates additional kitchen complexity
- How it affects purchasing and preparation quantities
- Whether customers see it as good value
- Whether it complements other dishes and drinks
Adding a “small plate” button to the till is the easy part.
Making that option operationally and commercially successful requires much more thought.
Flexible menus need disciplined systems
Flexible portions can quickly create inconsistency if they are not properly controlled.
If a full portion and a smaller portion are both available, each needs an accurate recipe and a clear preparation method.
Otherwise, the kitchen may serve inconsistent quantities, the stock system may deduct the wrong usage and the theoretical margin may bear little resemblance to what is happening during service.
Businesses will need to ask:
- Are the portion sizes clearly defined?
- Are both recipes correctly built in the stock system?
- Does the EPOS button connect to the correct recipe?
- Are teams trained to prepare each version consistently?
- Is actual usage being compared with theoretical usage?
- Are changing customer choices affecting purchasing forecasts?
- Is waste falling, or simply moving somewhere else?
Without this discipline, flexibility can become another source of unexplained variance.
Drinks may be affected too
GLP-1 users are also changing how they drink.
NIQ found that 29% are consuming less alcohol or drinking it more slowly, while around a quarter have increased their consumption of soft and hot drinks.
For bars, pubs and restaurants, this may influence product mix as much as food sales.
A decline in traditional alcohol consumption does not automatically mean a decline in opportunity.
It could increase demand for premium soft drinks, lower-alcohol options, functional drinks, better coffee and more thoughtful alcohol-free serves.
But operators need to know what is genuinely selling.
Adding ten alcohol-free products because the trend sounds exciting is not a strategy.
Monitoring demand, stock movement, waste and margin is.
Historical data may need more context
Forecasting systems often rely heavily on previous sales.
But previous behaviour becomes less useful when the behaviour itself is changing.
A venue may continue purchasing according to last year’s product mix while customers are ordering fewer mains, more small plates and different drinks.
That creates the risk of:
- Overstocking slower-moving products
- Running out of newly popular items
- Producing too much during preparation
- Increasing food waste
- Misreading falling sales in certain categories
- Missing opportunities in others
Good forecasting must combine historical information with current operational reality.
The report may show what changed.
An experienced operator still needs to ask why.
This is an opportunity to improve choice
Hospitality should not respond by labelling customers or dividing menus according to medication use.
Many people who have never used a GLP-1 also want smaller portions, healthier choices, lower-alcohol drinks or the flexibility to build their own dining experience.
The wider opportunity is to give customers more control without creating chaos for the operation.
That could mean:
- Offering two clearly defined portion sizes
- Making starters available as main courses
- Creating nutritionally balanced small plates
- Developing better alcohol-free and lower-alcohol drinks
- Allowing customers to choose side dishes more flexibly
- Reviewing whether oversized portions are creating unnecessary waste
- Designing menus around quality and satisfaction rather than volume alone
The businesses that respond well will not be those that chase a headline or create a gimmicky “weight-loss menu.”
They will be the businesses that notice how their customers are changing, adapt their offer thoughtfully and ensure their systems, recipes and processes change with it.
GLP-1s may be changing appetites.
The bigger hospitality question is whether menus, margins and operations are ready to change too.
Leave a Reply